Self-made is a good story and it is not true about anybody.
On This Page
I have spent forty years in industry, worked for five very large corporations, and I could not give you a single skill I have that I did not get from watching somebody do it first. Not one. The way I run a meeting came from a man who ran good meetings. The way I handle a bad number came from watching two people handle bad numbers, one of them well and one of them badly, which taught me the same lesson from both ends. Even the things I figured out alone, I figured out using a method somebody showed me.
The Law of Modeling says it is hard to improve when you have no one but yourself to follow. That is the polite version. The blunt version is that you are already following somebody, right now, and if you have never chosen who, then it is whoever happened to be nearby when you were forming.
That is worth sitting with. You did not opt out of modeling by being independent. You just did it without picking.
You Are Already Copying Somebody, Probably by Accident
Think about how you deliver bad news. Where did that come from? Not from a class. You watched somebody do it when you were 24 and impressionable, and you either adopted their approach or built yours as the opposite of theirs, and either way they are in there.
Same with how you handle a room going quiet on you, how you say no, how you respond when somebody older challenges you in front of other people. All of that got installed by observation, mostly before you were 30, mostly from people who were not trying to teach you anything.
Some of what you picked up is good. Some of it belonged to a man having a rough decade, and you have been carrying his worst habit around for twenty years thinking it was your personality.
So the first act of this Law is an audit, not a search. Before you go looking for someone to follow, find out who you are already following. Pick one thing you do under pressure and trace it back. You will usually land on a face, and the face is usually surprising.
Do Not Copy a Person. Copy a Piece.
Here is where most people go wrong, and it is why so many role-model conversations go nowhere.
They look for one whole person to emulate. Somebody who has the career, the family, the temperament, the health, the whole package. That person does not exist, and going looking for them ends the same way every time: you find somebody impressive, you learn something disappointing about them, and you throw out everything including the parts that were genuinely worth having.
The move is to copy pieces.
One person for how they run a meeting. A different one for how they handle a mistake in public. A third for how they talk to somebody twenty years younger without condescending. A fourth for how they say no without damaging anything. None of those four has to be admirable in any other respect, and you do not have to like them.
That reframing solves the biggest objection people have to this Law, which is that they cannot find anybody in their world worth following. You are not looking for somebody worth following. You are looking for one specific thing somebody does well. That person exists on every floor of every building you have ever worked in.
What This Looks Like When You Get It Wrong
It looks like copying the output instead of the method.
Somebody sees a person they admire get up at four thirty and write for two hours, so they set an alarm for four thirty. It lasts nine days. They copied the visible result of a design built for somebody else's life, energy and obligations, instead of copying the thing that was actually transferable, which was that the person decided in advance and protected it.
It also looks like hero worship, which is modeling with the brakes off. You take on somebody's whole approach, including the parts that only work because of who they are, and you end up performing an imitation that reads as fake to everybody but you.
And the opposite failure is just as common: refusing to model at all, out of a conviction that copying is cheating. That is pride wearing a work ethic. Every craft in the world is taught by watching, and figuring it out alone is not more honorable, it is just slower and more expensive.
Models You Never Meet Still Count
If you are somewhere with nobody nearby doing the thing you want to do, this Law still applies. It just runs on different fuel.
Books, recordings, interviews, long-form conversations. Those are real models, and for one specific purpose they are better than a person in your building: you can watch them think. Somebody in your office shows you their conclusions. Somebody writing a book at length shows you the reasoning that produced them, which is the part you actually needed.
Two rules make this work instead of turning into consumption.
Go narrow and deep. One person, several of their things, over months. Skimming forty people gives you opinions. Staying with one gives you their method, and the method is what transfers.
And test it in your own conditions. A distant model cannot see your situation, so everything you take from them is a hypothesis. Try it, watch what happens, keep what survives your actual job.
That is also the honest answer for anybody who is self-taught or working in an unconventional field. You are not exempt from this Law. You are running it on a different supply, and the supply is fine.
Why You Want Several People and Not One
This connects straight to mentorship, and it explains why the best arrangement usually does not look like the picture in your head.
The picture is one wise person and a standing appointment. That happens, and it is wonderful when it does. It is also rare, and waiting for it is why a lot of people have nobody at all.
What is available to everybody is several people covering different pieces. Somebody a step ahead in your function. Somebody strong where you are weak. Somebody outside your industry entirely, who asks the obvious question that nobody inside it is permitted to ask. Most of these relationships are informal and most of the people in them would not describe themselves as your mentor.
There is also a piece of this that people skip, which is modeling downward. Spend some of your time with people behind you, because teaching a thing is how you discover whether you actually understand it, and because you can only see how far you have come by looking at somebody standing where you used to stand.
And one warning. Modeling somebody exactly like you is comfortable and it caps you fast. If every person you learn from thinks the way you already think, you will get better at your existing approach and never acquire a second one.
Where to Go Next
- Can I Have Multiple Mentors at the Same Time? The practical version of copying pieces instead of people. Yes, and here is how to do it without it becoming a job.
- Does Mentorship Work if You're Self-Taught or Unconventional? For anybody whose path does not have an obvious person standing further along it.
- What's the Law of 33% in Mentorship and Why Does It Matter? How to split your time between people ahead of you, beside you and behind you.
Three articles that go further:
One Thing to Do This Week
Name three people and one thing each.
Not three heroes. Three people you have actual access to, and one specific thing each of them does better than you. It can be small. Runs a tight meeting. Never gets rattled. Writes an email you can read in one pass.
Write the three names and the three things on one piece of paper.
Then this week, watch one of them do their thing on purpose, the way you would watch somebody weld if you were trying to learn to weld. Not to admire it. To see the moves.
That is modeling, and it costs you nothing but attention you were spending anyway.
Put One Law Into Practice, With People Who Will Notice
John's 15 Laws Mastermind is a small group built on honest reflection, guided discussion and real accountability — eight weeks, six to eight people, using Maxwell's framework for intentional growth. Or start with the free Wednesday workshop; nothing is sold in it.
Save My Seat Wednesday